Real-world evidence
RWE that lands with HTA reviewers.
Synthesise registry, claims and chart-review evidence into a defensible RWE story, fit-for-purpose for the HTA body you're submitting to, with biases captured and limitations addressed before the reviewer raises them.
Watch it run on your work.
Where this fits in your workflow.
Synthesise registry, claims and chart-review evidence into a defensible RWE story, fit-for-purpose for the HTA body you're submitting to, with biases captured and limitations addressed before the reviewer raises them.
Most teams running RWE today juggle a stack of search tools, PDF readers and consultancy slides, then spend the back half of the project reconciling claims to sources. Knowledgeable collapses that into one defensible workflow: rwe that lands with hta reviewers.
The work runs against your literature, trial registries, HTA precedent, label and SmPC, with every sentence pinpoint-cited so your senior reviewer opens a document that's already at QC.
- 1Scope & comparator locked
- 2Evidence pulled & graded
- 3Draft built with citations
- 4QC pass against framework
The work that finally lands the way you scoped it.
Registry, claims and chart-review unified
One synthesis across the data assets that actually exist for your indication, not a wishlist.
Fit-for-HTA
Built against the specific RWE expectations of NICE, G-BA, HAS, not a generic 'RWE summary'.
Bias and limitations addressed
Confounders, indication creep and selection bias surfaced and addressed in-line.
Continuous refresh
New publications and registry updates trigger an automatic flag and re-synthesis.
Bring RWE into the dossier on the reviewer's terms.
Audit your RWE baseBuilt for HTA-grade RWE.
Sources tracked, biases captured, limitations addressed. Audit-ready and reproducible.